Last week, a man named Nicola Perullo was named the new president of the Slow Food University of Gastronomic Sciences in Piedmont, Italy. He replaces the larger-than-life founder of the Slow Food movement and its earliest voice, Carlo Petrini, who recently passed away.
During the seven years I taught in the graduate program there, I only met Perullo once, in passing.
But the students would often share their impressions of his seminars with me.
Perullo is a brilliant scholar and self-styled contemporary philosopher. On paper, there’s no doubt about it, this dude has the goods (Derrida was an advisor on his doctoral thesis!). He’s carved a name for himself in the world of food and wine thanks to his extensive and impressive writings on the aesthetics of wine.
Because I taught communications, my students and I often discussed the historic natural wine movement and its epistemological implications: how natural wine, as an abstract concept, shaped our knowledge of wine knowledge.
I can’t remember a semester when the students didn’t ask me what I thought of Perullo’s core belief (and I believe that “belief” is the right word here because of the quasi-religious elements of the biodynamic and natural wine movements): if a wine tastes good, then it must be bad, he would instruct them. In other words, if it pleases it must be a product of the Babylonian wine industry.
It’s a paradox. It’s a conundrum. And it flummoxed my students.
It was Carlo Petrini himself who anointed Perullo as his successor. I can’t recall anywhere in his writings where Petrini made such an audacious claim. But it’s clear that this is the direction Perullo will lead the institution.
Until my final year there, I enjoyed teaching in Pollenzo immensely. But I also saw how the hyperaestheticization of wine distances it from its nutritional design. My students would often complain how Perullo and his natural wine fellows (all from Triple A distributors) would demean them because of their supposed lacunose wine knowledge.
It’s one of my biggest takeaways from the experience: if wine can’t be good and fun and shared in joy and friendship, what’s the point?








